With the Apple-Motorola
Mobility FRAND patent trial set to begin Monday at 1pm, Judge Barbara
Crabb responded negatively to Apple's stated willingness to enter into a
licensing agreement with Motorola Mobility for the right to use the
latter's standards-essential patents,
only if it didn't have to pay more than $1 per Apple iPhone.
The judge noted her thoughts in an "Opinion and Order" entered with the
court on Friday. Judge Crabb does not want to order Motorola to make an
offer to Apple if the Cupertino based firm is going to use that offer
as a negotiating tool, and she now "
believe[s] it would be inappropriate to grant Apple's clarified request for specific performance".
She added that if ordering Motorola to make an offer to Apple would end
all of the patent litigation or extended negotiations, she would have
granted Apple's request for specific performance, but "i
t is now clear that specific performance would not resolve those concerns".
 |
| Judge Crabb is not happy with Apple |
Apple
didn't help its cause by using a 'blackmail' type approach to the $1
rate it tried to force on Motorola and the court. The Cupertino based
firm should have known that those wearing a judge's robe don't like
being forced into doing anything. We recommend that Apple's attorneys
watch a few episodes of
Judge Judy
to learn that. A similar statement was made in the Microsoft-Motorola
Mobility FRAND case which is going to trial on November 13th. In that
case, Judge James Robart told both sides to stop using the court "
as a pawn in a global, industry-wide business negotiation". The difference between the two cases is that Microsoft subsequently
agreed to accept
whatever rate the court decides, a decision that scares the heck out of
Apple. Motorola Mobility pointed out Microsoft's behavior to Judge
Crabb and asked why Apple couldn't be so agreeable.
Judge Crabb
is now considering whether or not to allow a trial on Apple's other
claims. If Apple wins on these other claims, it might be able to prevent
Motorola Mobility from enforcing its standards-essential claims against
it. Both sides have until noon on Sunday to respond to the order (don't
forget the end of daylight savings time on Sunday morning, guys!) and
both sides need to be ready for the possibility that the trial will
start at 1pm Monday. On the other hand, Apple has apparently ticked off
Judge Crabb enough that she
might call off the trial.
For once, Apple's arrogance in a courtroom, which Judge Koh and the
jury in the Samsung case seemed to turn a blind eye to, might have
worked against it.
source:
FOSSPatents
No comments:
Post a Comment